Sports writers love hyperbole – a breathtaking, stupefying, mind-blowing way to attract fans to read stories, watch ‘big-time’ events, and read more stories.
Grantland Rice started much of it in the 1920s by calling Babe Ruth the ‘Sultan of Swat,’ Red Grange the ‘Galloping Ghost,’ and Jack Dempsey the ‘Manassas Mauler.’ In the 1980s, we depicted our Olympic hockey victory over the Soviets as a ‘miracle on ice,’ a moniker that was more a political statement than a religious one. Last night, that ecclesiastical nickname was resurrected before, during and after the USA’s hockey game vs. Canada, our dear friends to the north. The game was ‘epic,’ ‘astounding,’ ‘unbelievable.’
Even now, ESPN is broadcasting a tribute to ‘the miracle on ice‘ held 30 years ago in Lake Placid, N.Y. (going so far as to interview Klinger!, who had watched the game from the stands.)
On Sunday night, Canada had seemingly shut down the country in order to prepare for its hockey game against the United States – much like Americans lock down for the Super Bowl. Some writers likened the pre-hockey game atmosphere in Vancouver to the Mardi Gras. The United States defeated Canada 5-3 for the first time in 50 years at the Olympics after securing the win with a last-minute empty-net goal to stun everybody.
How big was this game for us Americans? It was shown on cable, bumped from the national broadcast for the ice dancing and skiing shown on NBC. Epic.
Let’s see how the print media assessed, puffed, and embellished the game from both sides of the border.
- The New York Daily News’ Filip Bondy broke out a reference to Al Michaels’ famous quote, writing: “Do you believe in mega-meltdowns? Because that’s what we have here in Canada – a full-blown, red-and-white, maple-leaf-shaped panic.” His column offered the historical context for the game.
- The Associated Press believed in hyperbole in its lead:
VANCOUVER, British Columbia — The Americans didn’t believe in miracles. They just believed.
And they pulled off the biggest Olympic hockey upset since the Miracle on Ice, stunning Canada, 5-3, yesterday to advance to the quarterfinals of an already mixed-up tournament.
- The Philadelphia Inquirer’s Phil Sheridan also referenced Al Michaels, characterizing the game as the proverbial ’statement game.’
VANCOUVER – This miracle on ice didn’t win any medals. The way Team USA played, its 5-3 upset of Team Canada tonight wasn’t even a miracle.
The Americans, an unknown quantity coming into this keenly anticipated Olympic tournament, declared themselves serious medal contenders by taking a quick lead and then responding to a furious effort by Canada’s team of all-stars.
Practically speaking, the U.S. team (3-0) advanced directly to the quarterfinals while Canada (2-1) must play a classification game to advance. But this game was much more than that. It was a statement game for the young, fast and gritty Americans, who now have to be considered serious medal contenders.
- The Christian Science Monitor wonders: Do Americans really understand the enormity of this victory over Canada?
In Canada, meanwhile, writers magnified the loss, saying it was embarrassing, heart-breaking, and decimating.
- The Vancouver Sun stated that the loss killed the nation’s Olympic spirit. Consider the headline on the paper’s hockey gamer: ‘Woe Canada, U.S. sticks stake in our hearts.’
- The Hamilton Spectator’s Steve Milton eschewed Al Michaels in his lead, preferring to cite America’s best film critic instead.
Mike Babcock didn’t have to be Roger Ebert to critique what he saw on film last night.So expect Roberto Luongo in net tomorrow night when Team Canada faces it’s first must-win game of the 2010 Olympics. Because Martin Brodeur didn’t do anything to help his team in their must-win-to-get-a-rest game.
Martin Brodeur left his A game in his other pants as the U.S.A. beat the favoured home side 5-3 last night, muffling the crimson chorus which is making Canada Hockey Place the dangerous decibel capital of the world this week.
- Damien Cox of the Toronto Star writes a story that looks to the future more than the game itself, offering context and analysis along the way. In his other game story, he offers mostly play by play with no quotes.

How best to turn yourself from sports fan to professional sports journalist? Quickly moving beyond general guidance about sports writing, Joe Gisondi focuses on the nitty-gritty, with hands-on, practical advice on covering 20 specific sports. From auto racing to wrestling, you’ll find tips on the seemingly straightforward—where to stand on the sideline and how to identify a key player—along with the more specialized—figuring out shot selection in lacrosse and understanding a coxswain’s call for a harder stroke in rowing. Preparing you for just about any game, match, meet, race, regatta or tournament you’re likely to cover, Field Guide to Covering Sports is the ideal go-to resource to have on hand as you master the beat. You can